Christine Große – ny filosofie doktor i data- och systemvetenskap

Tis 08 sep 09:16

Måndag den 7 september försvarade Christine Große sin doktorsavhandling "Towards Systemic Governance of Critical Infrastructure Protection: State and Relevance of a Swedish Case".

Christine Grosses disputation 200907

I och med den rådande situationen med coronapandemin hölls disputationen både på plats på Campus Sundsvall och digitalt via Zoom. Runt 10 personer var på plats på campus och digitalt hörde och såg runt 20 personer Christine försvara sin avhandling och hur hon blev godkänd.

Huvudhandledare
Professor Aron Larsson

Biträdande handledare
Dr. Olof Björkqvist
Docent Pär Olausson

Opponent
Professor Alexander Fekete, Cologne University of Applied Sciences

Betygsnämnd
Professor Henrik Tehler, Lunds Universitet
Professor Karin Hedström, Handelshögskolan vid Örebro universitet
Docent Henrik Florén, Mittuniversitetet
 

Se Christines presentation av avhandlingen (YouTube)

Ladda ner och läs avhandlingen
 

Abstract

The protection of infrastructure that is critical to society’s functionality, survival and progression has gained significance for both national security and research because of its large-scale and interdependent nature. Critical infrastructure can be viewed as a complex, socio-technical system-of-systems that imposes extensive requirements on governance efforts to foster critical infrastructure protection (CIP), regardless of whether it involves public organisations, private organisations or both.

This dissertation investigates how systemic thinking can develop understandings of CIP and its governance. For this purpose, the dissertation presents research that was conducted in the context of an unexplored Swedish governance approach for CIP against power shortages. The dissertation consists of a three-part thesis and six peer-reviewed publications.

Part A of this thesis presents the results of a substantial review of scientific literature on the concepts of systems, infrastructure and governance. Because of their recursive nature, the concepts encounter a common challenge in characterising their key elements, structures and processes. The multi-level character of CIP provokes governance to systemically address the behaviours of adaption, emergence and entropy which the complex system exhibits. Apart from contributing nuanced knowledge of systems, infrastructure and governance, Part A provides a novel frame of reference for research in the area in the form of a kaleidoscope for integrative system analysis – KISA.

Part B presents the key results of a case study on the Swedish Styrel approach. The investigation is based on an examination of documents that relate to the case, interviews with 66 responsible experts and a survey among all 21 County Administrative Boards and 10 power grid operators that are responsible for stabilising the power grid during disturbances. The contribution of Part B is threefold. First, it originates an extensive representation of an unexplored case of CIP governance. Second, it offers a new comprehension of practical challenges in CIP governance due to the complex nature of the system and the entangled processes. Third, it provides empirical evidence that indicates areas for development of CIP governance practices.

Part C presents the results of the synthesis of theoretical and practical findings. It coalesces perspectives of critical infrastructure and system protection to elaborate on the concept of systemic governance. Fundamentally, systemic governance of CIP integrates the nexus of governance, management and leadership to address challenges regarding key properties of complex systems: entropy, emergence and adaption. Part C defines the theoretical contribution of this dissertation, namely the concept of systemic governance of CIP.